performance managing a manager

Submitted by j Dean
in

I'm about to pick up line management of someone who himself has a team of 6 staff.  I've managed staff for years, but never anyone who has responibiliuty for others' performance.

 

My new direct, Jack, isn't performing well. There are sickness absence issues, missed deadlines, poor quality work.  I don't yet know how well he manages his staff but I think I see poor performance & a sloppy attitude  in the staff team too.  They might think they're doing ok?  I don't yet know if they've had feedback or our version of regular O3s.

 

My question is which order do I tackle things in?  My gut feeling is in 3 months Jack will have resigned or been sacked.  My colleague has tried to handle his performance over the past year and not made any noticable change. Should I start managing his staff directly myself so they have the best possible chance to improve?  OR should I try to manage them through Jack?  How?

 

I look forward to any thoughts you might have.  Thank you in advance.

Submitted by j Dean on Thursday September 24th, 2009 3:43 pm

Pick up starts on MOnday and I don't have a plan.  If you are aware of resources I could use or have experiences I'd love to hear.

Submitted by John Hack on Monday September 28th, 2009 7:11 am

Don't assume anything.  Start with one on ones, and pay attention to what's happening (behavior, not characterizations)
Gather your data, independently of the past.  Give him a chance to show you what he does, and how well his team performs.  
Let Jack handle the team for now.  If this has been going on for a year or more, a few more weeks aren't a big deal.  You won't know what's best until you observe, for yourself, what's happening.   
John Hack